Photography is fun. At least it should be. Learning composition should be fun too. Some seem to want to turn it into a dry subject full of jargon and theory. This, to me, is about as exciting as accounting (no offense accountants).
I recently read an essay on composition aimed at beginning photographers wherein the author delved deeply into an artistic theory having to do with relative size and perspective of objects in a landscape photo, citing numbers and ratios and no end of “inversely proportional”. All this to say that an object that’s closer to you appears bigger than an object that’s farther away. Huh? Even Bailey the labradoodle knows that. After about the fifth interminable and repetitive paragraph of this I was ready to either nod off or just give up photography all together.
I don’t know about you, but when I’m photographing, I don’t care that an object half the distance from the main subject than a similarly sized object contains 5 times the square root of pi more importance in the composition than another object that is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the photographer’s position and the nearest McDonalds.
It’s enough to make your head spin.
Give us a break. This is supposed to be fun, not rules of engagement.



